बिटकॉइन में शासन नहीं

अटल शक्ति: कोई नियम नहीं

जब मैं CoinMetrics में पहली बार प्रवेश करा, मेरे मेंटर ने मुझसे सवाल पूछा: “क्रिप्टो में ‘शासन’ का मतलब क्या है?” पहले, मुझे DAOs, मतदान τोकन, 47-पेजगी सफ़ेद पुस्तक समझ में aई। परंतु, जब मैंने बिटकॉइन पर देखा—उसमें कोई सफ़ेद-प्रणाली, सभी-अधिकार-योग्य-अधिकार-प्रणाली?

और yet—कुछ bhi nahi tootaa.

यह आपचल nahi hai।

कोड, हैशरेट & ORZ: Three Pillars

बिटकॉइन tīn Shaktiyon par chalata hai jo silence mein saman karte hain:

• विकसक: code likhte hain—lekin upgraden force nahi kar sakte।
• खनिक: transactions validate karte hain—lekin consensus ke bina history change nahi kar sakte।
• धारक: BTC khud rakhte hain—unke ‘मत’ ka matlab sirf paise dūsre jagah transfer karna hai।

Koi bhi permanent power nahi rakhta. Par saath mein? Wo ek system banate hain jahan badlav tabhi hota hai jab sab agree karein—chup-chap migration aur adoption ke zariye।

Jaise ek democracy jahan har kisi ko chhodne ka hak hai agar unhe rules pasand na aaye—ballot ki zaroorat nahi padti।

PoW ko Hatao to Governance Aati Hai

Ab yeh bahut interesting baat aati hai: PoW hi ekmaatr solution hai scale par Byzantine faults ka. Isse hatane par —jaise PoA ya PoS mein badalna—ab kisi ko decide karna padta hai ki kon blocks sign karega।

Yahī governance aati hai—not as an add-on feature, but as a necessity.

PoA chains jaise Jouleverse mein, aapko validators ko vet karana padta hai. Unka control kaun rakhta hai? Sybil attacks se bachna kaise? Aap door khole aur ummed lagaye — toh system permissioned ban jaata hai jo decentralization ke naam pe chhupa hota hai。

Phir incentive distribution: PoW mein miners automatically coins mine karke reward paate hain। Non-PoW chains mein? Kisi ko decide karna padta hai ki kon reward deserve karti hein—kitni aur kab? Yeh decision-making process? Wohi governance—with all its political risks and centralization traps.

DAO Trap & Ab Kya?

Kuch projects corporate efficiency ko decentralization ke saath milate hain: Uniswap ek DAO use karti hein high-level decisions ke liye; Aave community treasuries rakhti hein; Ethereum Foundation development like nonprofit tech company chalati hein—but still reports directly to donors and grant councils.

Par main tumse poochta hun: Agar tumhari top-tier team employees ki tarah performance reviews ke under kaam karti ho… toh woh sachme free ho saktye hein?

Shayad hum overcomplicate kar rahe hain. Full decentralization har layer par force na karne ya companies sab control na karne ke bajaye—we could adopt hybrid model:

• Community-elected board long-term strategy dekhega,
• Lekin operations traditional management (CEO + teams) ke zariye chalegi—with clear KPIs and incentives,
• Saath hi code open rahega aur audit trails public rahenge. The goal isn’t purity—it’s sustainability under pressure. The moment we stop asking “How do we make this fully decentralized?” and start asking “How do we build something resilient without collapsing into chaos?“—we’re closer to truth than any whitepaper ever was.