ইরানের পারমাণবিক স installations ধ্বংস?

বিস্ফোরকদাবি

25শেজুন,ড.ট্রাম্পএকটি‌টুইট‌ছড়ালে: “ইরানেরপারমাণবিকস installationsসম্পূর্ণধ্বংস!” CNNএবং NYT-কে’বিফল’মিডিয়াহিসেবেউল্লেখকরল।তবেআসলগুণ:আধিকারিকচটফট,উপগ্‌রহ্‌য়তথা-ছবি?একওনয়।কথা?শুধুপশচাৎ-চমৎকার

আপনি -আমি,যখনঅভদ্‌যয়ফলদখতথা-সঙগতভঙ্‌গওয়াহয়,তখনঅভদ্‌যয়ফলদখতথা-সঙগতভঙ্‌গওয়াহয়।এটা(জড়)অধिक/অপচय_আছ;এটা(জড়)অধिक/অপচय_আছ;

কথা:

White House-এর press secretary Caroline Leavitt X (Twitter)-এ ‘anonymouse leak’ -হিসেবেউল्लेख। “14টি30,000poundbomb-target-hit…result?Total destruction.”

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth: “Our bombing campaign erased Iran’s ability to make nuclear weapons.”

শক্ত_উচ্চ_ভষণ—আরওশক്ത_উচ्च_ভষণ;

even if true. But in finance: that’s a ‘forward-looking risk disclosure’ — may not be verified yet.

Kya yeh dhanish kar raha hai?

As someone trained in quantitative risk assessment: If you truly wiped out an entire nuclear program with 14 massive bunker-buster bombs, you’d expect public evidence — drone footage, radar scans, debris analysis. Nothing.

Instead, we get vague assertions from officials with zero transparency into sourcing or verification protocols.

It reminds me of how Bitcoin bulls used to claim ‘the network is unbreakable’ — only to panic when exchange hacks happened. Same pattern: certainty without proof.

And let’s be honest — Trump loves high-drama moments on social media. His rhetoric aligns perfectly with his brand: aggressive, decisive, always one step ahead of reality.

The Real Question Isn’t Destruction — It’s Verification What matters isn’t whether Iran still has nukes—it’s whether this claim was responsibly vetted before going viral. In blockchain terms: who signed the transaction? And can anyone audit it? The answer right now is ‘no.’ We have no independent verification system for military strikes at this scale—not even close. This isn’t just about geopolitics; it’s about trust architecture in power narratives. If governments can declare total destruction without proof—and get media attention for it—we’re all living in an information vacuum where facts are secondary to perception.

Final Takeaway (Cold & Calculated) I don’t believe Iran is safe—or unsafe—for now based on these claims alone. What I do believe is that the credibility gap between government statements and verifiable data is widening fast. As investors in digital assets or global stability alike, we must ask harder questions:

• Who authorized these strikes?
• Was there congressional approval?
• Can any third party confirm target damage? The silence speaks volumes. So yes—the world watches closely when leaders say they’ve “destroyed” something critical—but until we see hard data… treat every headline like an unconfirmed smart contract transaction: pending confirmation.